🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a law lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," said the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the local level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments internationally are no longer content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.